HR now a U-19 Club

5.1 Club Eligibility

a) Club must be based on a state- or nationally-accredited school that issues High School Graduation Diplomas.

b) Club must be represented by a Roster that is limited to: players that are registered students at the High School upon which the Club is based, plus players that have graduated from that High School, plus up to a maximum of five (5) special exemption players in 2009, three (3) special exemption players in 2010 and two (2) special exemption players thereafter.

c) Special exemption players are students that do not have an otherwise available high school contact rugby program, and are either home-schooled students in the Club high school district, or are students from high schools in districts that are contiguous to, or overlapping, the club district.

It appears that recent changes in the USA rugby rules now exclude HR from The National High School Club Championships. They are not based on a nationally accredited school that issues High School graduation diplomas and cannot meet the single school student guidelines.

HR will only be able to measure itself against the best U-19 clubs. Missing the opportunity to play many of the very teams in the country.

Rather than tighten up the import player guidelines, USA Rugby now allows U-19 teams such as HR to have 5 non resident and non student players. This gives a rubber stamp to a class separation of those teams with the money and contacts to import players from other countries, 2% of the teams, while the remaining teams look to their local players exclusively.

USA rugby has also ignored their own 2005 report complied by Ed Hughes, by omission, and is now condoning and encouraging the illegal and planned practice of non resident players overstaying their visas to play in the National Championships. Education, staying in school and the visa laws are not a part of the U-19 formula.

This is PROGRESS??

Perhaps someones conscience will be rattled when one of these young men is arrested, deported and not permitted to return to this country for 10 years. A moral dilemma indeed. Who makes such decisions and why?

The logic, fairness and moral rationale is beyond me?